Time: Sequence and direction
Time part 2: what the river said
More talk of what rivers say
What the rivers say, part 3: Reincarnation
The river said: See my swell, my bends, my falls and my rapids? Look at this section, it is a bend. We'll call it Bend. Look at this section: it is rapids, we'll call it Rapids. And look here; falls, which we will call Falls.
Bend, Falls and Rapids are all part of the same river, and yet Bend, Falls and Rapids are rapidly different forms. Here, the water is calm, and turns softly to the right: here it rages, leaps over rocks, white and roaring, jumping up towards the sky, frothing like a mad thing. Here, it tumbles from the earth into the air, only to crash down again far lower. Bend, Falls and Rapids are vastly different things, are they not? At least, Bend, from Bend's perspective, feels nothing like Falls or Rapids, and Falls and Rapids feel the same towards Bend, and eachother.
And yet, from the water's perspective... first the water is Bend, and then it is Rapids, and then it is Falls. All three are simply water playing different rolls, inhabiting forms. These forms have shape, yes, but they are still simply Tendancies: when the water is in This location, it moves This way: the sum-total of all water moving This way in This location is Bend. When the water is beyond bend, it will move This way, and when the water moves This way, it is Rapids.
So you see? Water, formless, creates forms, is forms, and yet remains formless.
The river said:
Human, are you any different? Some of those people believe in reincarnation,and they think that "Jorge, Takashi, and Lakshmi" will live again. They misunderstand. The form is fleeting: it is the formless that ever continues. Form, which in rivers is called Bend, or Falls, etc, is in humans called the Ego.
You will flow away from your current form one day, and the water that you are will continue...
a river dialouge, part 4: identification
Everyone wants to be darth vader?
Do you love 'the secret?' Please read this
Once upon a time in Shangri-la there was a great, wise, and psychic king who's wealth was unmatched before or after his reign. One of the reasons he was so wealthy was because he had no attachment to the money: he would give it away to anyone, and often did so. whenever someone in the kingdom needed, they would ask him for money.
He had only two rules about giving money: the asker had to be honest about their desires, and in general, the asker had to care as much about the rest of humanity as they did themselves. In Shangri-la, most people fit the criteria, so the king was always giving money away.
One day, a merchant came to the king. The merchant was rich, but desired more.
"What do you desire?" Said the king."
"There is a pearl made entirely of fire," said the merchant. "I would love to have it."
"I see," said the king.
The merchant continued: "I know you want us to care about others as much as ourselves, and I very much always want to help my fellow humans out. I love doing so, and to prove that I do, I have given away 10% of my fortune, and donated three days of every month towards volunteer work."
The king considered for a while, and said: "I have heard your desire to help your fellow humans, and your desire is granted. Stewards will be dispatched to your house to remove 90% of your remaining wealth, and distribute it to the people. We will alert the people of your generosity and love for them. Thank you."
The merchant was stunned. He went home. A year passed. In a year, the same man, no longer a merchant, sought an audience with the king.
"King," he said, "how wise you are! I came here with greed in my heart, a year ago, but you gave me something much better than the object of my greed. You gave me the ability to serve, and there I found freedom. I still have 10% of my fortune left, and in service, I give it to you, to give to the people."
But the king refused to take it. Instead, he gave the merchant a larger fortune than the former merchant had ever seen, including the fiery pearl. The King new very well that the fortune, including the pearl, would all be shared for love of humanity, and so it was.
---
secretlovers: if you do a good deed in order to receive things that will please your ego, are you not treating the universal mechanisms as if they were retail shops, attempting to trade spiritual service for worldly reward? do you not think the universe can tell?
It will evolve you...
On Teachers and Preachers
The question came to me after reading a comment Meenakshi left to some hapless type doing his best to be a candle. : )
I chose the monk's method of research... I let the question roll around in my brain, and take root, then I forgot about it, and went about living-- inspiration would reveal an answer, or a lesson from my life.
The answer came later: the difference is Judgement.
Are you running from your shadow?
A River Dialogue, the conclusion: On Enwaterment
The river said:
So I've told you about form and formless: you do not yet truly believe it or understand, and such is the way of things. To identify with form is to not see formless: she who sees and understands formless cannot identify with form. And so, for rivers, to truly understand these words would be to identify with water and not bend/rapids, and to be Enwatered: To be enwatered is, simply to understand that beyond its form, a river is water and water is it.
You are formless, and formless is you.
Yes, of course it is no different for a river than it is for you, once again. Except, instead of water, human, the formless you are is light. Science has found this, religion has always suggested. Formless is all, formless is one.
All manner of wonders begin with this simple understanding.
Quick aside: scientifically and metaphysically, what IS consciousness?
Metaphysically, it's light. Scientifically, it's the intentional product of neurons firing in the brain.
But what IS the product of neurons firing in the brain, scientifically? Physically, neurons create electric currents. Electricity. ...Light.
And, is there any of your bio-energy that you cannot trace, directly, to the sun?
So you see, it is not arguable, really, that all you are is light infused matter (which, given string theory, is another form of light). Any way you look at it, this is so. And if, in the case of our human existence, consciousness is light, perhaps light is, itself, consciousness? There are more photons in the universe than any other subatomic particle... what if the universe, indeed, were a form of consciousness, different from our own, but our base?
To identify with formless is to identify with pure energy, superstrings, light; with the god-hood of all things. To see formless is to see light; the God-hood of all things. At it's base (because enlightenment is, more than anything, a journey,) this is what it means to be enlightened: to realize that you are light, and light is you. If this sounds to you incredible, that's because it is. Shanti.
What do you search for within yourself?
To the ride or die girls
On impossible dreams-
In this time of shifting values, ideas, consciousness and beliefs, in this time where the very idea of what is possible begins to mutate causing a fundamental upheaval of worldview: for those who, by virtue of unscientific things like 'past life memories' remember a different mode of life, choices arise. How could they not?
The memories of other ways of living are popping up more and more in the human scheme, and how hard they can be to balance. We wonder: how do we regain something missed, desired, without striving to go back? How do we go forward in concert with understanding how many other directions we could be going, and what's there?
Perhaps we will add more ways of life, more possibilities and probabilities and potentialities to our human scheme by pursuing that which is in our heart, from the intermingling of what is now and what is remembered. In any case, what an interesting position to be in!
And how some of us must have empathized when, in The Matrix (a film quick becoming one of our myths), Neo, with his mouth wide in awe, hears the following: "Did you ever have a dream you were so sure was real?"
Dreaming, of course, is the first step to daring, and daring is the first step to doing. perhaps these dreams, dimly remembered or vivid, happy or nightmarish, exist to spur us into some action... I wonder, if that's true, which would be more dangerous-- to follow them, or to ignore them?
Joseph Campbell, in the end, seemed to have one piece of advice: if an arrow points out of your soul in a particular direction, no matter the direction, you are well advised to follow.

Help



