Do you believe there is value in suffering?
Short answers: suffering is the product of misalignment with the universe: it is a message, that tells us the future we are co-creating with the universe (for we are always co-creating our future, it's undeniable, your choices matter) is an undesirable one. There is no intrinsic value beyond the value of a signal.
Longer answers:
suffering is the product of misalignment with the universe:
to understand the big concepts like suffering and fate and such, one cannot look from a three-dimensional perspective. People have tried looking from three dimensional perspectives for centuries, and it simply has not worked.
string theory tells us that there are at least 11 dimensions, and it suggests that all that is happening on all of these relates, somehow, to our experience. this can only be true. Do you think it possible, with all physics tells us (including all it's unexplained phenomena) that any bit of anything does not exist in higher dimensions? I know it's a weird phrasing, but it's on purpose. the point is, you are a mulitdimensional being, and so is everyone. To such a degree that things like "karma" are descriptions of activities on higher levels, which can only be simplifiied and made shallow when put into words.
the long or short of it is, with some degree of understanding of higher dimensional vibrational tendencies, it's clear. our actions towards one and other effect us all in very deep ways.
In understanding of the higher dimensional reality, it becomes clear that for happiness, one must live happiness, and foster it in others, including, even, the earth: for we are effected deeply by the states we create for others, and the states others create for us. this in and of itself matters so very deeply, and we can see in the history and current events of earth the results of carelessness.
suffering, therefore, is a result of actions taken out of misunderstanding: actions that could only result in suffering, because they created suffering through carelessness or malice. These actions were the result of ignorance: acting on only three dimensional-input, the actors didn't understand that to ignore fundamental universal principles is to incur a state of relative disharmony, aka suffering.
Suffering is a message, that tells us the future we are co-creating with the universe (for we are always co-creating our future, it's undeniable, your choices matter) is an undesirable one.
Imagine this: you are cooking a nice meal, the stove is on. you put on your oven-mitt to take a look at the mac n cheese, shwarma, whathaveyou. Only there's a hole in the oven mitt and you don't know it. Well, when you touch the hot part of the oven, your hand immediately begins to incur damage. The heat kills cells. The hand has a method of alerting you this is happening, because if it didn't, it'd be nearly impossible for you to survive. (there is a special kind of disease where people can't feel pain, and it's a serious, serious problem.)
The hand sends to you a signal: pain. The pain says "something's wrong, fix it." In that, the pain is a message, that the future you are co-creating with the universe (in this case, you and the stove are creating burns) is undesirable.
It's the same with your emotions as well. However, with the emotions the issue is more complicated, because the worst thing to do in the world is, every time an emotion that causes suffering arises, blame it on the situation it arose from. Because the inner world is always the lion's share of the situation for the individual, often, the fix for emotional suffering, the correction of course from the undesirable to the desirable future, is an entirely internal one.
One knows one has got it when one really and instantly begins to feel better, and not when one thinks: if I do (x negative emotion-based action) I'll feel better. The difference is subtle and real. Change, indeed, comes from within.

Help



